Code Watchdog Criticises Insurer for Misleading Rejection Letters

1

The situation was highlighted by the Committee's chair, Jan McClelland, who underscored that every consumer has the right to transparent communication, especially when denied an insurance policy. McClelland pointed out that the insurer incorrectly communicated that the denials couldn't be reconsidered unless new information was provided, which was not the case.

According to the committee, 170 applicants were affected by this communication failure. The insurer has now been directed to reassess its decision letters, as well as its operator scripts, and to report its findings back to the committee. The initial issue, reported in November 2023, involved template letters that omitted crucial information about customers' rights to submit additional information or to seek a review or file a complaint.

Efforts to correct the error were initially made by the insurer with updated letters. However, these attempts fell short of the standards set by the Life Insurance Code of Practice. The compliance committee noted that the language used implied finality in the decision while simultaneously suggesting, albeit ambiguously, the possibility of a review.

The insurer's internal oversight was also criticised for failing to catch and address this lapse, leading to customer confusion. Instead of directly notifying affected customers, the insurer relied on financial advisers to communicate the information, which was inadequate according to the committee. McClelland noted that the oversight in internal checks left customers inadequately informed.

Despite not naming the insurer, the committee acknowledged the provider's efforts to rectify the situation, which played a role in withholding the name from the public.

Published:Tuesday, 24th Jun 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

ClearView Names New Underwriting Head Amidst Strategic Changes 30 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori ASX-listed life insurer ClearView has announced the appointment of Peter Tilocca as Head of Underwriting, coinciding with key updates to its underwriting standards and definitions. Tilocca's extensive two-decade career in Australian underwriting includes leadership roles at Zurich, Noble Oak, One Path Life, and RGA Australia. His new role with ClearView commenced on 30 June. - read more

Ombudsman Supports Theft Claimant in Home Business Coverage Dispute 30 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori A recent case has seen a policyholder triumph over her insurer after the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) ruled in her favour following a contentious dispute regarding home business operations. The controversy arose when the woman's theft claim was denied by her insurance provider, IAG, over allegations of fraudulent misrepresentation about the use of her rental property. - read more

AFCA Upholds Insurance Fraud Ruling Over Disputed Possum Accident 26 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori A motorist's claim that he crashed into a tree to avoid a possum has been denied by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), which supported the insurer's fraud decision. The incident involved the driver crashing his Jeep—insured for over $20,000—on a dimly-lit street, purportedly avoiding the rain-soaked motorway en route to the store. - read more

Code Watchdog Criticises Insurer for Misleading Rejection Letters 24 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori The Life Code Compliance Committee has recently reprimanded a life insurance provider for issuing misleading rejection letters to policy applicants. These letters were deemed 'ambiguous and contradictory' and failed to clearly inform applicants of their review options after being denied coverage. - read more

Insurer Ordered to Pay Full Claim for Confusing Patio Coverage 23 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori A recent ruling mandates that an insurer must fully honor a storm-related claim due to ambiguous policy wording regarding items in open areas. The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) determined that the insurer's restriction on coverage for items in a patio area was unfounded, as the policy's phrasing was not clear. - read more